NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Freetel Communications Pty Ltd v In Eop Chung; In Eop Chung v Freetel Communications Pty Ltd [2003] NSWADT 169 DIVISION: Retail Leases Division APPLICANT 1 Frreetel Communications Pty Ltd APPLICANT 2 In Eop Chung PARTIES: RESPONDENT 1 In Eop Chung RESPONDENT 2 Freetel Communications Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER: 035005 ; 035030 HEARING DATES: 16/04/2003 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 04/16/2003 DATE OF DECISION: 04/22/2003
BEFORE: Donald BG - Judicial Member APPLICATION: Claim for declaration of rights, obligations and liabilities under a lease - Claim for payment of money - Claim for surrender of possession of premises MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994 CASES CITED: Manly Council v Malouf [2003 ] NSWADT AP 12 Conoid Pty Limited v International Theme Park Pty Limited [1999] NSW SC 1138 APPLICANT 1 B Morris, barrister APPLICANT 2 REPRESENTATION: In person RESPONDENT 1 In person RESPONDENT 2 B Morris, barrister ORDERS: 1. Declare that there is no continuing lease of premises by the Applicant Freetel and that the Respondent Ms Chung is entitled to possession of the space occupied by Freetel.; 2. Order that upon three weeks notice from Ms Chung to Freetel requiring vacant possession, Freetel vacate the shop 23 Railway Parade, Eastwood.; 3. Application by Freetel for compensation dismissed.; 4. Cross application by Ms Chung for unpaid rent and interest dismissed. ; 5. Each party to bear their own costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate