NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: FA v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police (GD) [2004] NSWADTAP 7 APPELLANT PARTIES: FA RESPONDENT Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police FILE NUMBER: 039069 HEARING DATES: 5/12/2003 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 12/15/2003 DATE OF DECISION: 03/10/2004
FA v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] NSWADT 196 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President); Higgins S - Judicial Member; Bolt M - Non Judicial Member CATCHWORDS: relevant/irrelevant considerations - statutory interpretation MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 023284 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 08/28/2003 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Australian Securities Commissioner Act 1989 LEGISLATION CITED : Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Commomwealth) Freedom of Information Act 1989 Interpretation Act 1987 BY v Director General, Attorney General's Department [2002] NSWADT 79 C and Department for Community Development, Re [1994] WAICmr 18 Commissioner of Police v District Court of NSW (1993) 31 NSWLR 606 Department of Health v Jephcott (1985) 62 ALR 421 Hamilton and Queensland Police Service [1994] QICmr 21 (1994) 2 QAR 182 Ingram v General Manager, Sutherland Shire Council [2000] NSWADT 69 Johns v Australian Securities Commissioner (1993) 178 CLR 408 Latham v Director General, Department of Community Services [2000] NSWADT 58 McCann and Queensland Police Service [1997] QICmr 10 CASES CITED: Mills v Meeking (1990) 91 ALR 16 Prisoners' Legal Service Inc and Queensland Corrective Services Commission [1997] QICmr 4 Public Interest Advocacy Centre and Department of Community Services and Health and Schering Pty Ltd 23 ALD 714 R v Abdullah [1999] NSWCCA 188 Re Pochi and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1977) 2 ALD 33 Re Rees and Australian Federal Police 57 ALD 686 Re Scholes and Australian Federal Police (1997) 44 ALD 299 Saleam v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2002] NSWADT 40 Watkins v Chief Executive, Roads and Traffic Authority [2000] NSWADT 11 Woodside and anor v Director General, Department of Community Services (CSD) [2000] NSWADTAP 8 APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: In person RESPONDENT M Tzannes, barrister ORDERS: 1.The Tribunal's decision to affirm the agency's determination to refuse access to the Issue 2 documents is set aside to the extent that the decision relies on the agency having made out an exemption pursuant to Clause 4(1)(b) to Schedule 1 of the Freedom of Information Act 1989. Because the Tribunal did not deal with the exemption under Clause 6, that issue is remitted to the Tribunal pursuant to s 114(2)(b) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997. We leave to the Tribunal the question of whether to hear further evidence on that issue. ; 2.In relation to the deleted portions of document D1 of the Issue 3 documents, the Appeal Panel affirms the Tribunal's decision. ; 3. In relation to the deleted portions of document D3 of the Issue 3 documents, the Appeal Panel affirms the Tribunal's decision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate