NSW Caselaw
CITATION: HO v NSW Attorney General's Department [2008] NSWADT 224
DIVISION: General Division
APPLICANT HO PARTIES: RESPONDENT New South Wales Attorney General's Department
FILE NUMBER: 083168
HEARING DATES: 23 June 2008
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 31 July 2008
DATE OF DECISION: 14 August 2008
BEFORE: Handley R - Deputy President
MATTER FOR DECISION: Preliminary matter
Freedom of Information Act 1989 LEGISLATION CITED : FOI Regulation 2005 District Court Act 1973 Evidence Act 1995
R v Prasad (1979) 23 SASR 161 N (No 3) v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2002] NSWADT 34 Commissioner of Police NSW Police Service v N (2003) NSWSC 943 Budd v Director, Attorney General's Department [2006] NSWSC 1267 CASES CITED: N v Director General, Attorney General's Department (GD) [2002] NSWADTAP 41 NZ v Director General, Attorney General's Department (GD) [2005] NSWADTAP 62 Re Altman and the Family Court of Australia (1992) 27 ALD 369 N (No. 2) -v- Director General, Attorney General's Department [2002] NSWADT 33 Our Town FM Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1987) 16 FCR 465 Re Dingjan and ors ex parte Wagner and anor (1995) 183 CLR 323
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT D Hartman, solicitor
ORDERS: Pursuant to s 10 of the Freedom of Information Act 1989, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the decision refusing to amend a document containing information concerning HO's personal affairs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate