NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Thai Star Video Pty Limited v Walpole [2007] NSWADT 193
DIVISION: Retail Leases Division
FIRST APPLICANT Thai Star Video Pty Limited FIRST RESPONDENTS PARTIES: Thaensa Walpole & Ari Walpole SECOND APPLICANT Ari Walpole SECOND RESPONDENT Thai Star Video Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER: 065156, 065184
HEARING DATES: 16 March 2007, 28 March 2007
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 28 March 2007
DATE OF DECISION: 27 August 2007
BEFORE: Fox R - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Claim for declaration of rights, obligations and liabilities under a lease
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
Conveyancing Act 1919 LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 Retail Leases Act 1994
Aspromonte Pty Limited v Zagari [1999] NSWSC Duncan's Catering Pty Limited v Bankstown City Council [2005] NSW ADT 158 Four Seasons International Agricultural Pty Limited v Iacullo [2002] NSW ADT 91 Freetell Communications Pty Limited v In Eop Chung [2003] NSW ADT 169 CASES CITED: Jarre Pty Limited v Vumbaca [1998] NSW Conv R 55-832 at 56,515-56,520 Protogeros v Fouzas [2004] NSW ADT 62 Randi Wixs Pty Limited v Pokana Pty Limited (No.2) [2003] NSW ADT 4 Rolet v Baron [2002] NSW ADT 316 Tribunal in Perhauz v SAF Properties Pty Limited [2007] NSW ADT 122 Whiteway House (No. 100) Pty Ltd v Abrocoona Pty Limited [1998] NSW SC 52
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate