NSW Caselaw
Set aside by Appeal : Set aside by appeal on 15/12/00
CITATION: Western Aboriginal Legal Service Limited -v- Jones & anor [2000] NSWADT 102 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT Western Aboriginal Legal Service Limited
PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT Alan Jones
SECOND RESPONDENT Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Limited FILE NUMBER: 161 of 1996 HEARING DATES: 03/04/2000, 04/04/2000 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 04/04/2000 DATE OF DECISION: 07/31/2000
BEFORE: Rees N - Judicial Member at 1; Silva A - Member at 1; Luger M - Member at 166 APPLICATION: Racial - Vilification - Vilification - Racial MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Radio 2UE Sydney v Parker (1992) 29 NSWLR 449 Qantas Airways Ltd v Squires (1984) EOC 92-102 Pearce v Glebe Administration Board (1985) EOC 92-131 Australian Iron Steel Pty Ltd v Banovic (1989) 168 CLR 165 Qantas Airways Ltd v Gubbins [1992] 28 NSWLR 26 Boehringer Ingelheim Pty Ltd v Reddrop [1984]2 NSWLR 13 Leves v Haines (1986) EOC 92-176 Harou-Sourdon v TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited (1994) EOC 92-604 CASES CITED: Wagga Wagga Aboriginal Action Group v Eldridge (1995) EOC 92-701 R v Marinkovic and Marinkovic (1986) EOC 92-841 He Kaw Te v R (1985) 157 CLR 523 Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1993) 173 CLR 359 IW v City of Perth (1999) 91 ALJR 943 Farquhar v Bottom [1980] 2 NSWLR 380 Nealy v Johnston (1989) 10 CHRR 6450 Parmiter v Coupland (1840) 6 M.W 105 at 108; 151 ER 340 Bellino v Australian Broadcasting Commission (1996) 185 CLR 183 London Artists v Littler [1969] 2 QB 375 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: D Black, barrister RESPONDENT R Campbell, barrister ORDERS: 1. Complaint substantiated against both respondents ; 2. The first and second respondents to broadcast an apology in the terms set out in Annexure A to these orders within 28 days of the date of these orders ; 3. The first respondent to send a letter of apology to the complainant in the terms set out in Annexure B to these orders within 28 days of the date of these orders ; 4. Liberty to apply in relation to the implementation of orders 2 and 3 and the question of costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate