NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Crewdson -v- Niland & Ors [2001] NSWADT 87 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT Gerard Crewdson RESPONDENTS PARTIES: Carmel Niland Helia Gapper Raoul Salpeter Teresa Anderson FILE NUMBER: 011015 HEARING DATES: 01/05/01 23/05/01 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 05/23/2001 DATE OF DECISION: 06/29/2001
BEFORE: Innes G - Judicial Member; Farmer L - Member; McDonald O - Member APPLICATION: Victimisation MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 58/98 Crewdson v Director General, Department of Community Services CASES CITED: 67/98 Crewdson v Central Sydney Area Health Service Casey v Entrad Corporation Ltd (EOC 92-179) Sloey v State Transit Authority [1999] NSWADT 49 APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: FIRST TO THIRD RESPONDENTS A Moses, barrister FOURTH RESPONDENT J Clark, barrister ORDERS: Orders made on 23 May 2001 ; 1. This complaint is dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to s 111 (1) (a) of the Anti-Discrimination Act. ; 2. No order is made as to costs.
Reasons for Decision
INTRODUCTION
1 This decision deals with a complaint of victimisation under s 50 of the Anti-Discrimination Act of NSW lodged by the complainant against the four respondents on 21 January 1999.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate