NSW Caselaw
Set aside by Appeal : Set aside by appeal on 28/8/01 (Court of Appeal)
Appeal Panel
CITATION: Mitry -v- New South Wales Bar Association (LSD) [2000] NSWADTAP 9 revised - 02/04/2001 APPELLANT Richard Mitry PARTIES: RESPONDENT Council of the New South Wales Bar Assocition FILE NUMBER: 999015 HEARING DATES: 30/11/99, 14/04/2000 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 04/14/2000 DATE OF DECISION: 06/30/2000
Principal matter DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President); Blackman J - Judicial Member; Bubniuk L - Member CATCHWORDS: bias - no evidence MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 9721 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 08/30/1999 LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Barwick v Law Society of New South Wales [2000] HCA 2; (2000) 74 ALJR 419 New South Wales Bar Association v Hamman [1999] NSWCA 404 Wentworth v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 Allinson v General Council of Medical Education and Registration [1894] 1 QB 750 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW v Costello [1984] 3 NSWLR 201 at 203) Ziems v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales) [1957] 97 CLR 279 Incorporated Law Institute of New South Wales v Meagher (1909) 9 CLR 655 Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman (1994) 34 NSWLR 408 In re Davis (1947) 75 CLR 409 Prothonotary v Pangallo (1993) 67 A Crim R 77 CASES CITED: Law Society of New South Wales v Bannister (1993) 4 LPDR 24 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 449 Murray v Legal Services Commissioner (1999) 46 NSWLR 224 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Carver v Law Society of New South Wales (1997) 43 NSWLR 71 (CA) Dovade P/L v Westpac Banking Group (1999) 46 NSWLR 168 (CA) R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate; Ex parte Pinochet (No 2) Aussie Airlines P/L v Australian Airlines P/L (1996) 65 FCR 215 Re Polites; Ex parte Hoyts Corporation P/L (1991) 173 CLR 78 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Trustees of the Christian Brothers v Cardone (1995) FCR 345 APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: W G Hodgekiss, barrister RESPONDENT P R Garling SC, barrister ORDERS: 1. Decision under appeal affirmed; 2. The costs of the Respondent to be paid by the Appellant, as agreed or assessed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate