NSW Caselaw
Equal Opportunity Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION: Ventura -V- Walt Disney Television Animation Pty. Ltd. [1998] NSWEOT
COMPLAINANT: Fe Ventura
RESPONDENT: Walt Disney Television Animation Pty Ltd
NUMBER: 32 of 1997
TRIBUNAL: Judge H G Murrell S.C. ( Senior Judicial Member )
GROUNDS OF COMPLAINT: Sex and disability discrimination in employment, and victimisation
DATES OF HEARING: 04/24/1998 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/24/1998
Complainant: Ms M Reheby Legal Aid Commission (Solicitor) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Mr D Lloyd (Solicitor)
JUDGMENT IN FAVOUR OF: Respondent
Summary
Background
1. The complainant's complaint alleged sex discrimination in the course of her employment by the respondent. The conduct in question included the display of sexually explicit material and frequent swearing in the workplace.
2. Pursuant to section 110A(1)(b) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (the Act), the complainant sought a non-publication direction prohibiting identification of herself.
3. The complainant asserted that publication of her identity would cause embarrassment and would aggravate the stress from which she already suffered.
Held
4. The alleged sexual conduct is not in the same category as that in Loder v O'Callaghan (1984) EOC 90-025. Many proceedings before the Tribunal concern allegations of a personal and sensitive nature . The complainant's embarrassment and stress are an insufficient basis to depart from the general rule that the Tribunal's proceedings are to be openly administered.
5. Application refused. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TRIBUNAL NO. 32 of 1998 FE VENTURA -v- WALT DISNEY TELEVISION ANIMATION PTY. LTD.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate