NSW Caselaw
Equal Opportunity Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION: Abrahams & Ors -V- Harwood Nominees Pty. Limited [1996] NSWEOT
COMPLAINANT: Abrahams and Others
RESPONDENT: Harwood Nominees Pty. Limited
NUMBER: 68-100 of 1996
Judge Patten ( Judicial Member ) TRIBUNAL: Ms. S. Tracey Mr. O. MacDonald
GROUNDS OF COMPLAINT: Age discrimination in the provision of goods and services
DATES OF HEARING: 10/28/1996 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/28/1996
Complainant: Mr. J. Basten Q.C. (Counsel) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Mr. A. Sullivan Q.C. (Counsel)
JUDGMENT IN FAVOUR OF:
This was the hearing of an application by the Respondent under Section 111 of the Anti-Discrimination Act ("the Act") for orders that each of 43 complaints before the Tribunal be dismissed.
The matters were referred to the Tribunal by the President of the Anti-Discrimination Board of New South Wales (respectively "the President" and "the Board") in May 1996. In his letter of referral the President stated that the Board had been unsuccessful in attempting to gain access to information necessary to purse its investigation and accordingly had formed the view that the complaints were not capable of conciliation. They were referred pursuant to Section 94(1) (a)(c) of the Act.
The complaint to the Board signed by each of the 43 Complainants was in the following terms:-
"TO: THE NSW ANTI DISCRIMINATION BOARD
We the undersigned hereby make a complaint against Harwood Nominees Pty Ltd and CSR Ltd that they are discriminating against us by the following proposed actions: A payout from the CSR Staff Superannuation Fund ('SSF Fund') by its trustee Harwood Nominees Pty Ltd of $100,000,000.00 to its holding company CSR Ltd. The granting of a windfall credit of 27% of the value of their entitlements to present CSR employees.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate