NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Hayward v Timilty [2009] NSWDC 54 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): November 2008 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 December 2008 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 January 2009
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Williams DCJ
DECISION: The plaintiffs have been substantially unsuccessful in their claim. Likewise, except for the matters on the Scott Schedules the builder has been substantially successful. There will therefore be a verdict for plaintiff on the plaintiff's claim against the builder to the extent of any adjustment needed to be made by the schedules and a verdict for the builder on the builder's cross-claim against the plaintiff again, subject to the schedules and what I have said in paragraph 157.
CATCHWORDS: BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION - Home Building Act - interpretation - enforceability - validity of contract - costs plus contract - fixed price contract - "estimate" meaning of - "quote" meaning of - quantum meruit - false and misleading conduct - civil fraud
Trade Practices Act 1974 Fair Trading Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED: Contracts Review Act 1980 Home Building Act 1989. Evidence Act
Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Paxu Pty Ltd 1982 149 CR 191 Palmer –v– Dolman 2005 NSWCA 361 Broadshaw –v–McEvans P/L (1951) 217 ALR 1 Neat Holdings P/L –v–Karajan Holding P/L (1992) 67 ALJR 170 Winterton Constructions P/L –v–Hambros Australia P/L (1992) 39 FCR97 Pavey and Mathews P/l –v– Paul (1986) 162 CLR 221 Horton –v– James (1934) 34 SR (NSW) 368 Coshott and Anor v Fewings Joinery Pty Ltd [1996] NSWCA 122 Sunvara Pty Ltd v Williams [2001] NSWSC 433 McGrath and Another v Australian Naturalcare Products Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 2 Yorke –v– Lucas (1985) CLR 661 CASES CITED: Marks –v– GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998 196 CLR 494 ASX Operations P/L –v– Pont Data Australia P/L (1991) 27 FCR 492 Trimis –v– Mina (1999) NSWCA 140 Update Constructions P/L v Rozelle Child Care Centre (1990) 20 NSWLR 251 Flett v Deniliquin Publishing Co Ltd (1964-1965 NSWR 383 Cooks Constructions P/L –v– Stork Food Sytems Aust P/L 2008 QSC 179 Way –v– Latilla 1937 3 ALLER 759 Kane Constructions P/L –v– Sopov (2005) VSC 37 Kane Constructions –v –Sopov No 2 2005 VSL 492 Gray (Constructions) P/L –v– Hogan 2000 NSWCA 26 Mohammed –v– Local Court of NSW and Sleiman 2008 NSWSC 949 Brenner –v– First Artists Management P/L 1993 2VR 22
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate