NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Denovan v Tynan [2009] NSWADT 159
DIVISION: General Division
Applicant: Margaret Denovan PARTIES: Respondent: Judith Ann Tynan
FILE NUMBER: 085197
HEARING DATES: 16 April 2009
EXTEMPORE DECISION DATE: 16 April 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 22 June 2009
BEFORE: Fox R - Judicial Member
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Applicant Representative: In Person REPRESENTATION: Respondent Representative: Nick Dan, Solicitor
1. Note that bond monies have been repaid. 2. Lessor to comply with covenant 18.2 of the Lease. 3. Lessor to take all steps to have effected necessary repairs to prevent leakage into leased premises. ORDERS: 4. Lessor to forthwith appropriately place "Private" and "No parking" signs in carparking area of building to identify a space as the Lessee's. 5. Rent to be calculated from 19/9/07. 6. Lessor to pay $405.95 as damages being 4 days rent which should have been abated. 7. No order for costs.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 Pursuant to s89 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, the Applicant has requested written reasons for a decision which I made at a telephone directions hearing on 16 April 2009. These are they.
2 The application dated 1 October 2008 sought relief set forth in 6 items. The Applicant was not legally represented, and because she trades in the Newcastle area, appeared by telephone. The Respondent was represented by Mr Dan, solicitor, of Newcastle, and he too appeared by telephone.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate