NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v David Allan Williams [2006] NSWDC 203
HEARING DATE(S): 14-18 August 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 December 2006
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Nicholson SC DCJ
DECISION: Finding of unfit to be tried.; Accused referred to MHRT.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Fitness Hearing - Presser test applied
R v Presser [1958] VR 45 at 48 CASES CITED: R v Mailes (2001) 53 NSWLR 251 R v Dennison [1988] unreported, NSWCCA 3 March 1988
PARTIES: Regina David Allan Williams
FILE NUMBER(S): 06/11/0240
COUNSEL: M. Ainsworth - accused
SOLICITORS: Mr Turner - Crown
JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: On 14 August 2006 David Williams pleaded not guilty to ten counts of sexual assault, three of those counts were expressed to be in the alternative. A pre-trial voir dire hearing was held on matters not relevant to the present matter.
2 On the crown case the offences occurred at the accused' apartment on a morning of 25 August 2005. The complainant was, at the relevant time, the estranged wife of the accused. The case included allegations of physical violence, actual bodily harm and self manipulation of soft drink bottles into the vagina of the complainant. It must be recognised that the subject matter and the particular nature of the allegations would make such a hearing before a jury a stressful event not only for the complainant but for the accused as well.
3 On the second day of the trial counsel for the accused found himself in a situation where he felt compelled to seek leave to withdraw. Among other things he was concerned that symptoms of the accused' unfitness to be tried were being demonstrated in respect of the accused' capacity to instruct his legal team. The jury was discharged, a fitness hearing was scheduled. Ultimately that fitness hearing was conducted on 13 December last.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate