NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: RMS Financial Services Pty Limited (In Liquidation) v Mohamad Skaf [2008] NSWDC 63
HEARING DATE(S): 3/12/07 - 5/12/07, 27/3/08.
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 April 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Rolfe DCJ
DECISION: Verdict and Judgment for the Defendants.
CATCHWORDS: Claim by Company in liquidation for balance of purchase price said to be owing under a contract for sale of land - Defence of set off - Claim by Liquidator that alleged set off based on sham transaction - Preference Claim - Application to amend pleadings on last day of hearing
LEGISLATION CITED: Corporations Act 2001
RMS Financial Services Pty Limited (In Liquidation) (1st Plaintiff) PARTIES: Raymond George Tolcher (2nd Plaintiff) Mohamad Skaf and Raife Skaf (Defendants)
FILE NUMBER(S): 1793/06
COUNSEL: J Johnson (Plaintiffs) R Newton (Defendants)
JUDGMENT
1 The First Plaintiff in these proceedings, RMS Financial Services Pty Limited (In Liquidation), is a company which was wound up on 29 August 2004 by order of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. On that date the Second Plaintiff, Raymond George Tolcher, was appointed official liquidator of the First Plaintiff. From now on, I will refer to the First Plaintiff as the "Company" and the Second Plaintiff as the "Liquidator".
2 Prior to the Company being wound up, on 14 May 2004 it entered into a contract with both defendants for the sale by the Company to the defendants of the property known as 1021-1021A Canterbury Road Lakemba (the "Property") for the price of $1,500,000.
3 As at the date of the contract, the defendants' son, Roy Skaf, also known as Rayed Skaf, was a director of the Company. From now on I will refer to him as either "Skaf" or "the son".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate