NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Kiperman v Highflame Pty Ltd [2007] NSWDC 165 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 14, 15, 16 and 17 May 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 July 2007
JURISDICTION: District Court - Civil Jurisdiction
JUDGMENT OF: Johnstone DCJ at 1
DECISION: Judgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants for $29,970, and against the third defendant for $2,970; Defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs, on the ordinary basis
CATCHWORDS: Assault - plaintiff punched by nightclub bouncer supplied by security company - operator and licencee of nightclub vicariously liable - Negligence - supervisor from security company failed to intervene and discipline bouncer - operator and licencee of nightclub vicariously liable - Damages separately assessed for the assault, at common law, and under the Civil Liability Act for the negligence - statutory threshold for non-economic loss not met - exemplary and aggravated damages claimed but not awarded
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act 2002
Caledonian Collieries Ltd v Speirs [1957] HCA 14 at [12] Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers and Citizens Co-operative Assurance Co of Australia Ltd (1931) 46 CLR 41 Hollis v Vabu [2001] HCA 44 CASES CITED: Knight v McLean [2002] NSWCA 314 at [61] Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Limited [2006] HCA 19 Thomson v Bankstown Corporation (1953) 87 CLR 619 at 630 Zorom Enterprises Pty Ltd v Zabow [2007] NSWCA 106
Richard Kiperman (Plaintiff) Highflame Pty Limited (First Defendant) PARTIES: Daniel James Dixon (Second Defendant) The Prime Protection Group Australia Pty Limited t/as Prime Protection (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate