NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Baker v Smith Snack Food Company Ltd [2009] NSWDC 11
HEARING DATE(S): 2 - 5, 13 February 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 February 2009
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Goldring DCJ
DECISION: Verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $521,011.69
CATCHWORDS: MOTOR ACCIDENT - "injury" - MOTOR ACCIDENT - weight to be attached to documents of Medical Assessment Service - EVIDENCE - admissions - effect of acknowledgment by workers compensation insurer
LEGISLATION CITED: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999
Heuston v Yore Contractors Pty Limited (9 March 1992; BC9203270) Olsen v Identix Australia Pty Limited [2002] NSWSC 157 Pham v Shui [2006] NSWCA 373 CASES CITED: Fox v Wood (1981) 148 CLR 438 Woolage v New South Wales [2001] NSWCA 256 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164
PARTIES: David Baker (Plaintiff) Smith Snack Food Company Ltd (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 4820 of 2006
COUNSEL: A Lidden SC with E Welsh (Plaintiff) L T Grey (Defendant)
SOLICITORS: Bryden's Law (Plaintiff) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Defendant)
JUDGMENT
Issues
1 David Baker says that on 27 February 2001, while he was at work as a warehouse operator in Smiths warehouse, he was involved in an accident, which exacerbated an injury to his left knee.
2 Smiths say that if there was an accident, first, it did not involve any breach of duty on its part towards Mr Baker, and, secondly, that even if there was a breach of duty, this was not causally related to Mr Baker's current condition.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate