NSW Caselaw
CITATION: HP v Hunter New England Area Health Services [2009] NSWADT 186
DIVISION: General Division
APPLICANT HP PARTIES: RESPONDENT Hunter New England Area Health Services
FILE NUMBER: O83225
HEARING DATES: 27 March 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 27 March 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 16 July 2009
BEFORE: Higgins S - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Privacy – information protection principle – disclosure to third party
LEGISLATION CITED : Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998
Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police v EG (GD) [2004] NSWADTAP 10 FM and FN v Department of Community Services [2008] NSWADT 288 GR v Department of Housing (No.2) [2005] NSWADT 301 JD v NSW Medical Board (No.2) [2006] NSWADT 345 CASES CITED: NW v NSW Fire Brigade (No.2) [2006] NSWADT 61 NZ v Director General Department of Housing [2006] NSWADT 173 RD v Department of Education and Training [2005] NSWADT 195 Re Rummery & The Federal Privacy Commissioner & Anor [2004] AATA 1221 University of New South Wales v PC (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 26 WT v Auburn Council [2008] NSWADTAP 16
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT P Rooney, barrister
ORDERS: Pursuant to section 55(2)(a) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998, the respondent to pay to the applicant damages in the sum of $2,500.
REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction 1 HP has sought review of conduct by the respondent, the Hunter New England Area Health Services. The conduct, HP contended was a breach of the disclosure information protection principle under the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 ('the PPIP Act'). There is no dispute that on 10 January 2008, Ms A, an oncology social worker employed by the respondent, disclosed to Ms B, property manager of the Australian Rail Track Corporation ('the Corporation'), that HP was 'living happily in [name of town]'. What is in dispute is:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate