NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Profilio v Coogee Bay Village Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWADT 319
DIVISION: Retail Leases Division
First Applicant: Joe Profilio
PARTIES: Second Applicant: Rozi Sajko
Respondent: Coogee Bay Village Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER: 085127
HEARING DATES: on the papers
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 6 October 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 21 December 2009
BEFORE: Chesterman M - Deputy President; Ward R - Non-Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Retail lease – costs – interim award of costs
MATTER FOR DECISION: Costs
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008
Cripps v G & M Dawson Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 81 CASES CITED: Gizah Pty Ltd v AXA Trustees Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWADT 164 Profilio v Coogee Bay Village Pty Ltd [2009] NSWADT 211 Salon Today Pty Ltd v M M I R Pty Ltd [2009] NSWADT 71
Applicant Representative:
First Applicant: In person REPRESENTATION: Second Applicant: J Profilio, agent
Respondent Representative: T Rogers, barrister
ORDERS: The Applicants' application for costs filed on 31 August 2009 is dismissed.
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
1 This decision deals with an application for costs that has been made by the applicants in Tribunal proceedings before the determination of all questions raised in the proceedings has occurred.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate