NSW Caselaw
CITATION: West v Commissioner of Police (No 2) [2010] NSWADT 40
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
APPLICANT Paul West and Ors
PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT Commissioner of Police
SECOND RESPONDENT Paul Horner
FILE NUMBER: 071017
HEARING DATES: On the papers
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 28 August 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 11 February 2010
BEFORE: Huntsman C - Judicial Member; Kelleghan D - Non-Judicial Member; Lowe A - Non-Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Costs application
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Potier v Department of Corrective Services [2009] NSWADT 143 (16 June 2009) CASES CITED: Alramon Pty Ltd v Jonamill Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWADT 302 Salon Today Pty Ltd v MMIR Pty Ltd [2009] NSWADT 71 Kyriacou v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADT 175
APPLICANT D Hillard, solicitor
REPRESENTATION: FIRST RESPONDENT M Rizzo, solicitor
SECOND RESPONDENT S Wood, solicitor
ORDERS: Each party is to pay its own costs in the proceedings
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 In September 2004, Aboriginal Community Liaison officer, Paul West, and 16 colleagues lodged a complaint with the Anti–Discrimination Board against their employer, the Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service. The complaint concerned an email circulated on the Commissioner's internal email system.
2 After investigating and attempting to conciliate the complaint, the President of the Anti–Discrimination Board referred it to the Administrative Decisions Tribunal under s 93B of the Anti–Discrimination Act 1977 (AD Act).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate