NSW Caselaw
Equal Opportunity Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION: Simon -V- Dental Board Of New South Wales [1997] NSWEOT
COMPLAINANT: Tibor Simon
RESPONDENT: Dental Board of New South Wales
NUMBER: 106 of 1997
TRIBUNAL: Judge H G Murrell S.C. ( Senior Judicial Member )
GROUNDS OF COMPLAINT: Discrimination on the ground of race in the area of goods and services
DATES OF HEARING: 02/25/1998 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/29/1998
Complainant: In Person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Ms R Henderson (Counsel)
JUDGMENT IN FAVOUR OF: Complainant
Summary
Background
1. The complainant has poor English.
2. The complainant complained to the Dental Board about the standard of work undertaken by a dentist.
3. The Dental Care Assessment Committee (DCAC) investigated the complaint and reported to the Dental Board, which dismissed the complaint against the dentist.
4. The complainant lodged a complaint with the Anti-Discrimination Board (ADB), alleging discrimination in the manner in which the DCAC conducted the investigation.
5. The ADB dismissed the complaint as lacking in substance. At the complainant's request the matter was referred to the Tribunal.
6. Pursuant to section 111 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 the respondent asked the Tribunal to dismiss the complaint, contending that:
(1) the complainant's allegations lacked substance; and
(2) section 64 of the Dentists Act 1989 provided a complete defence to the claim.
The respondent called evidence in support of contention (1).
Held 7. Despite the apparent poverty of the complainant's case, having regard to the fact that he is unrepresented and has difficulty with the English language, the merits of the case should not be determined on a pre-hearing basis : Reyes-Gonzalez v Sydney Institute of Technology (Equal Opportunity Tribunal, 6 March 1998).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate