NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Hurcum v Domino's Pizza Australia Pty Limited (No. 2) [2007] NSWDC 74
HEARING DATE(S): 28/03/07, 20/04/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 May 2007
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Gibson DCJ
DECISION: Vary order 2 of the judgment of 8 March 2007 to provide that the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to (a) the issue of fraud; (b) the Notice of Motion of 14 June 2006 to vacate the previous hearing date; (c) the costs thrown away by the vacating of the trial which was fixed to commence on 15 June 2006; (d) the retention of Senior Counsel; and (e) the argument in relation to costs on 28 March and 20 April and the written submissions, are to be excluded from the operation of Division 9, Part 3.2 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW).
CATCHWORDS: Costs - application to exclude part of hearing costs for unsuccessful defence alleging fraud from the operation of Division 9, Part 3.2 Legal Profession Act 2004
Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), Division 9, Part 3.2, ss338 and 341 Uniform Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
CASES CITED: Port Stephens Council v Theodorakis (No. 2) [2006] NSWCA 143
PARTIES: Plaintiff: Wayne Walter Hurcum Defendant: Domino's Pizza Australia Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): No. 2705 of 2005
COUNSEL: Plaintiff: G B Hall QC Defendant: J Turnbull
SOLICITORS: Plaintiff: P K Simpson & Co Defendant: Lee & Lyons
Introduction
1. This is an application by the plaintiff for a special order for costs in relation to an unsuccessful plea of fraud in the defence filed in these proceedings. The plaintiff's application is brought pursuant to section 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) and Order 42 paras 42.1.15 and 42.1.20.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate