NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Mazzara [2007] NSWDC 102 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 27 April 2007, 17 May 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 May 2007
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Knox SC DCJ
DECISION: Verdict of not guilty; The accused is acquitted of the count.
CATCHWORDS: Trial by Judge alone - Robbery armed with dangerous weapon - Intent: Accused's capacity - Defence of claim of right - Accused's belief - Prasad direction
Criminal Procedure Act 1986 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 District Court Rules Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 1990
R v Minani [2005] NSWCCA 226 R v Damic [1982] 6 ACrimR 35 R v Fuge [2001] NSWCCA 208 CASES CITED: R v Langham (1984) 36 SASR 48 R v Lopatta (1983) 35 SASR 101 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250 R v Prasad (1979) 23 SASR 161; 2 A Crim R 45
PARTIES: Regina Giuseppe Mazzara
FILE NUMBER(S): 06/21/3272
COUNSEL: Crown: C. Everson Defence: N. Mikhaiel
SOLICITORS: DPP: E. Winbourne Defence: K. Browne
- 1 -
JUDGMENT
Indictment
1 On 27 April, 2007 the accused, Giuseppe Mazzara, was arraigned on an indictment brought under section 97(2) of the Crimes Act, 1900, as follows: On 15 August, 2006, at Liverpool in the state of New South Wales, being armed with a dangerous weapon, namely an imitation self-loading pistol, robbed Hilal Akloudis of $40, the property of Hilal Akloudis, trading as Mitre 10 Handy. 2 The accused pleaded not guilty. Election: Trial by Judge alone
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate