NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Chapman v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWADT 124
DIVISION: Revenue Division
APPLICANT Ian and Lynette Chapman PARTIES: RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
FILE NUMBER: 096093, 096104
HEARING DATES: 7 December 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 7 December 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 26 May 2010
BEFORE: Hirschhorn M - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Land tax – principal place of residence
LEGISLATION CITED : Land Tax Management Act 1956 Taxation Administration Act 1996
Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) v McIlroy [2009] NSWADTAP 21 CCSR v Ferrington [2004] NSWADTAP 41 CASES CITED: Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Mesiti [2003] NSWADTAP 57 McNally & Anor v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2003] NSWSC 1118 Commissioner of Land Tax v Christie [1973] 2 NSWLR 526 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Aldridge & Anor [2003] NSWADTAP 50
APPLICANTS Ian and Lynette Chapman REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
ORDERS: The Respondent's decision to assess the Applicants for land tax for the 2002-2008 land tax years inclusive in respect of the North Avoca property is set aside and a decision substituted that Mrs Chapman was entitled to the principal place of residence exemption in respect of the North Avoca property for each of the 2002-2008 land tax years inclusive.
REASONS FOR DECISION
Part A - Introduction 1 The Applicants, Mr and Mrs Chapman, have applied for review of two decisions by the Respondent, the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue, to deny them exemption from land tax in respect of the land tax years from 2002-2008 inclusive for a property owned by them at North Avoca, NSW ("the North Avoca property").
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate