NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Sullivan v State of NSW (NSW Police Force) [2009] NSWADT 2
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
FIRST APPLICANT Gary Sullivan
PARTIES: SECOND APPLICANT Janelle Walker
RESPONDENT State of NSW (NSW Police Force)
FILE NUMBER: 071083 ; 071084; 071085; 071127
HEARING DATES: 21 October 2008
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 21 October 2008
DATE OF DECISION: 7 January 2009
BEFORE: Britton A - Deputy President
CATCHWORDS: Dismissal of complaint-proceedings are subject to want of prosecution
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Bassili v Star City Pty Ltd [2008] NSWADT 62; Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service v Orr [2001] NSWADTAP 16; Dayton v Woolworths Limited [2005] NSWADT 271; Han v NSW Department of Health [2006] NSWADT 113; Harding v Vice Chancellor, University of NSW [2003] NSWADT 74; Hay v State of New South Wales (New South Wales Police Service) [2006] NSWADT 13; Hillman v Bankstown District Sports Club Ltd (No 2) [2007] NSWADT 179; CASES CITED: Karekar v TAFE Commission of New South Wales [2000] NSWADT 187; Lin v American International Assurance Company (Australia) Pty Ltd [2005] NSWADT 59; Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Limited [1999] NSWADT 73; Razaghi v Director General, Department of Health & anor [2005] NSWADT 202; Razaghi v Director-General, NSW Department of Health & anor [2002] NSWADT 4; Salama v Qantas Airways Ltd [2002] NSWADT 119; Shaikh v Police and Community Youth Clubs NSW Ltd & ors [2001] NSWADT 221; Tannock v State of New South Wales [1999] NSWADT 73;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate