NSW Caselaw
The Legal Services Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : The Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman [1991] NSWLST 9 PARTIES : The Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman FILE NUMBER(S) : of CORAM: JA Samuels - JA Mahoney - JA Meagher CATCHWORDS: Professional Misconduct - fail to keep accounts - Professional Misconduct - misappropriate trust moneys/moneys :- LEGISLATION CITED: Legal Practitioners' Act 1898 O'Reilly v Law Society of New South Wales, Court of Appeal, 23 December 1988, unreported; Bridges v The Law Society of New South Wales (1983) 2 NSWLR 361; CASES CITED: Law Society of New South Wales v Harvey (1976) 2 NSWLR 154 at 171; Law Society of New South Wales v Moulton (1981) 2 NSWLR 736; Hodgekiss (1962) SR (NSW) 340 at 343; Law Society of New South Wales v McNamara (Court of Appeal, 7 March 1980, unreported DATES OF HEARING: 09/09/91 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/1991 G.C. Lindsay LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: The Law Society (L.W. Pierotti) N.R. Burns Murray, Backhouse & Turner
JUDGMENT:
Supreme Court of New South Wales Court of Appeal The Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman Judgment Appeal from Solicitors' Statutory Committee Coram: Samuels JA, Mahoney JA and Meagher JA delivered on 9 September 1991 Counsel: Appellant: G.C. Lindsay Respondent: N.R. Burns Solicitors: Appellant: The Law Society (L.W. Pierotti) Respondent: Murray, Backhouse & Turner Appeal dismissed
Samuels JA
I have had the advantage of reading in draft the judgment prepared by Mahoney JA. It sets out the facts in some detail and I need not recapitulate them. I agree generally with his conclusions, save for the order for costs. But my view of the matter, which I can shortly explain, depends upon considerations somewhat different from those which Mahoney JA expresses.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate