NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Hiley v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADT 133
DIVISION: Revenue Division
PARTIES: APPLICANT Rebecca Hiley
FILE NUMBER: 086102
HEARING DATES: 20 April 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 20 April 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 9 June 2009
BEFORE: Perrignon R - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: First home owner grant, stamp duty, first home plus scheme, estoppel
LEGISLATION CITED : First Home Owner Grant Act 2000Duties Act 1997Taxation Administration Act 1996
Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Paspaley [2008] NSWCA 184 McTackett v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2003] NSWADT 154 BBLT & ors v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (NSW) 2003 ATC 5063 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Aldridge & Anor [2003] NSWADTAP 50 CASES CITED: AGC (Investments) Ltd v FC of T 91 ATC 4180 Stature Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2002] NSWADT 271 Ryan & anor v Commissioner of Land Tax [1982] 1 NSWLR 305 Sweeney v Fitzhardinge (1906) 4 CLR 716 Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Permanent Trustee Co Limited (1987) 9 NSWLR 917 Western City Developments Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWADT 293
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT Adam Gerard, solicitor
1. The decision made by the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue on 11 July 2008 to reverse his decision to authorise the first home owner grant is affirmed ORDERS: 2. The decision made by the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue on 20 August 2008 to reverse his decision to approve Ms Hiley's application for the 'First Home Plus' concession is affirmed 3. The decision made by the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue on 20 August 2008 to reassess stamp duty is affirmed 4. By consent of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue, his decision of 20 August 2008 to impose interest on the said stamp duty is set aside and replaced by a decision to impose no interest.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate