NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: PARKER v NOMINAL DEFENDANT [2007] NSWDC 40
HEARING DATE(S): 5-6 March 2007 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 8 March 2007
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
DECISION: 1. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $196,119.36. 2. Stood over for mention 9am 9 March 2007 to deal with issues of costs and any application for a stay.
CATCHWORDS: Nominal Defendant - Onus of proof - Drawing of inferences
LEGISLATION CITED: Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Regulation 1998
Hunt v The Nominal Defendant NSWCA B9603057-28.6.96, Johnson v The Nominal Defendant [2003] NSWCA 153, CASES CITED: Motor Accidents Insurance Board v Padget Full Court of Supreme Court of Tasmania FCA 81/1996, Padget v Motor Accidents Insurance Board (1996) 23 MVR 411, Schellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Ltd (2000) 200 CLR 121, The Nominal Defendant v Genn (2004) 42 MVR 249,
PARTIES: Coralie PARKER The Nominal Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S): Newcastle 714/05
COUNSEL: C A W Hart - Plaintiff P R Cummings - Defendant
SOLICITORS: Bale Boshev - Plaintiff Sparke Helmore - Defendant
JUDGMENT
HER HONOUR
1 In this matter Coralie Parker suffered three pelvic fractures when she was thrown from a motorcycle driven by Thomas Guy. Mr Guy is now Mrs Parker's husband.
2 The accident happened on 16 May 2004 as Mr Guy was slowing his motorcycle at traffic lights at the intersection of Belmore Road and High Street, Maitland.
3 The evidence indicated that the rear wheel of the motorcycle shimmied or fishtailed; that is, it moved from side to side when it came into contact with a patch of oil on a right turn arrow painted on the road surface. The wheel then recontacted the bitumen and abruptly stopped turning. As a result, both Mrs Parker and Mr Guy were thrown from the motorcycle.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate