NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Edo SAPUTRA [2009] NSWDC 239 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 11 September 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 September 2009
JURISDICTION: District Court Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Knox SC DCJ
DECISION: The offender is sentenced to a term of non-parole imprisonment of 5 years and 2 months and an additional term of 27 months .
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sentence - Criminal Code - drug importation - methamphetamine - role - mixed motivation: personal use and profit - parole conditions - notification of travel plans
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code (Commonwealth)
R v Bernier (1998) 102 A Crim R 45 R v Lee [2007] NSWCCA 234 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] 199 CLR 270 N v R; AP v R [2009] NSWCCA 108 CASES CITED: R v SC [2008] NSWCCA 29 R v Schluenz [2001] NSWCCA 314 R v Solomons [2000] NSWCCA 215 Veen v The Queen [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465 Wong & Leung v R [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584
PARTIES: Regina Edo Saputra
FILE NUMBER(S): DC 2008/20503
COUNSEL: Crown: Mr N Adams Defence: Mr A Parsons
SOLICITORS: Crown: Commonwealth DPP Defence: Ren Zhou Lawyers
JUDGMENT
1 On 30 June 2009 the offender pleaded guilty to the following count on an indictment: On or about 20 August 2008 at Mascot, in the Sate of New South Wales, imported into Australia, a substance, the substance being a border controlled drug, namely Methamphetamine, and the quantity imported being a marketable quantity.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate