NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Lindsay Ronald Jensen [2007] NSWDC 15
HEARING DATE(S): 11/12/06 - 15/12/06
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 January 2007
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Murrell SC DCJ
DECISION: Sentence of imprisonment imposed
CATCHWORDS: Sentence - Indecent Assault - Sexual Intercourse with child under 10
PARTIES: Crown Lindsay Ronald Jensen
FILE NUMBER(S): 06/11/0074
COUNSEL: Ms K Shead (Crown) Mr P Byrne SC (Accused)
SOLICITORS: Ms J Purches (Crown) Mr G Walsh (Accused)
JUDGMENT
The Charges 1 On 18 December 2006, a jury found the offender guilty of four counts of indecent assault on a child under ten years old, and one count of sexual intercourse with a child under ten. Each of the incidents occurred between 28 February 2002 and 1 January 2003, when the victim was nine years old.
2 In an earlier trial before Judge Knight, a jury found the offender guilty of 3 offences against the victim's older sister. Those offences occurred between 31 January 2002 and 16 May 2002, when the victim's sister was more than ten years old. The offender has not yet been sentenced for those offences.
3 The maximum available penalty for an offence of indecent assault on a child under 10 is 10 years' imprisonment. The maximum available penalty for an offence of sexual intercourse with a child under 10 is 20 years' imprisonment. Because of the age of the subject offences, no standard non parole period applies.
The Offences 4 The offender and the victim lived in country New South Wales. The victim's parents were separated. The offender and his family, and the victim's mother and her children were members of the Exclusive Brethren, a religious sect. The families had a close social relationship.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate