NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v James Duncan SMITH [2009] NSWDC 414
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 August 2009
JURISDICTION: District Court of New South Wales
JUDGMENT OF: Cogswell SC DCJ
DECISION: Total sentence of 14 years and 7 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 11 years and 7 months.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - convicted by jury trial - indecent assault - indecent assault in circumstances of aggravation - indecent assault on person under 10 - sexual intercourse with child under 10 - sexual intercourse without consent - some offences committed while on bail - offences involved breach of trust - limited degree of planning - offending opportunistic - likely to serve sentence in protective custody - dtandard non-parole periods fixed - no reasons to depart
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 s 61J(1), 61M(2), s 66A(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 21A, s 54B
CASES CITED: Fisher (1989) 40 A Crim R 442
PARTIES: Regina James Duncan Smith
FILE NUMBER(S): 2009/11/630
COUNSEL: Mr J Gibson Mr G Porter
JUDGMENT
1. James Duncan Smith was found guilty by a jury on 11 May 2009 of nine charges of sexual offences. I have heard evidence and submissions on the appropriate sentences to impose, and I am now embarking on the sentencing of Mr Smith.
2. First I should list what the charges for the offences were and the penalties which Parliament has attached to those offences.
3. Mr Smith was found guilty of committing an indecent assault on the victim between 1 May 2001 and 1 December 2002. That is an offence under s 61M(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 and has a maximum penalty of ten years fixed to it by Parliament. He was found guilty of having sexual intercourse with the same person, then a child aged under ten, during the same period. That offence is against s 66A(1) of the Crimes Act and carries a maximum of twenty years imprisonment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate