NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Amoedo & Dominguez [2006] NSWDC 187 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 14/08/06, 15/08/06, 16/08/06, 17/08/06
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 August 2006
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Norrish QC DCJ
DECISION: See para 114
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Application for Permanent Stay of Proceedings - abuse of process - unlawful conduct - Evidence - illegally or improperly obtained - seizure on the 'high seas'.
Fisheries Management Act 1991 Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED: Customs Act 1901 Customs (Interception of Vessels) Regulation 2001 Acts Interpretation Act (Cth) 1901
Watson v AG (NSW) (1987) 8NSWLR 685 Levinge v Director Custodial Services (1987) 9 NSWLR 546 R v Horseferry Road Magistrates Court ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42 Olbers Co. Ltd v The Commonwealth (2004) 148 ACR 547 Jago v The District Court of New South Wales (1986) 168 CLR 23 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 CASES CITED: R v Raby [2003] VSC 213 Project Sky Blue v The Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Lavender v The Queen (2005) 79 LJR 137 Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297 Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 R v Lijo & Ors [2004] WAD 29
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate