NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Vidler v Vidler [2009] NSWDC 319
HEARING DATE(S): 7-10 September 2009 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11 September 2009
JURISDICTION: District Court - Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
On the plaintiff's claim 1. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs in the sum of $163,137.62. 2. The first defendant is to pay the costs of the plaintiffs on an Ordinary basis up to and including the 31 August 2009 and on an indemnity basis thereafter. 3. The second defendant is to pay the costs of the plaintiffs on an ordinary basis DECISION: 4. The exhibits are returned - On the cross-claim 1. The cross-claim is dismissed 2. The cross-claimant is to pay the costs of the cross-defendant
CATCHWORDS: Debt recovery - Liability for debts of partnership - Reliance on Family Courts Orders when pre-conditions not fullfilled
Lindsay Victor Vidler (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) PARTIES: Ellen Jane Vidler (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Karen Elizabeth Vidler AKA Karen Elizabeth Wright (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) David James Vidler (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 12/08
COUNSEL: R Foord (For the Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants)
Friedlieb Byrne Solicitors (For the Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants) SOLICITORS: First Defendant/Cross-Claimant Self Represented Farrell Lusher Solicitors (For the Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate