NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Howe v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADT 200
DIVISION: Revenue Division
Applicant: Gregory Stuart Howe and Louise Anne Howe PARTIES: Respondent: Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
FILE NUMBER: 086094
HEARING DATES: 16 February 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 28 July 2009
BEFORE: Hirschhorn M - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Land tax exemption – primary productionTaxation Administration Act – remission of interest
Land Tax Management Act 1956 LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Taxation Administration Act 1996
Project Blue Sky Inc & Ors v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 153 ALR 490 Stature Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2002] NSW ADT 271 Giunta v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] NSWADTAP 19 CASES CITED: Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Incise Technologies Pty Ltd & Anor [2004] NSWADTAP 19 McDonald's Australia Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] NSWSC 6 Ettamogah Mob Australia Pty Ltd & Ors v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] NSWADT 22 Colusso and Ors v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWADT 79 Reysson Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADT 17
Applicant Representative: In person REPRESENTATION: Respondent Representative: Dr Roy, of Counsel
(1) The decision of the Chief Commissioner that the Property is subject to land tax in each of the 2004, 2005 and 2006 land tax years is affirmed. ORDERS: (2) The decision of the Chief Commissioner not to remit any of the market rate component of interest in relation to the 2005 and 2006 land tax years is affirmed. (3) The decision of the Chief Commissioner not to remit any of the premium component of interest in relation to the 2005 and 2006 land tax years is set aside. Instead, the full premium component of interest is to be remitted in both the 2005 and 2006 land tax years.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate