NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Jeffrey John MASON [2009] NSWDC 364
HEARING DATE(S): 3 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 3 November 2009
JURISDICTION: District Court Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Berman SC DCJ
DECISION: The offender is sentenced to imprisonment. I set a non-parole period of two years and a head sentence of four years.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence - Aggravated break, enter and commit serious indictable offence - Assault occasioning actual bodily harm - Mental illness
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
PARTIES: The Crown Jeffrey John Mason
FILE NUMBER(S): DC 2009/137742
COUNSEL: J. Booth - Offender
SOLICITORS: Director of Public Prosecutions Legal Aid Commission - Offender
SENTENCE
1 HIS HONOUR: Jeffrey John Mason appears for sentence today, having pleaded guilty in the Local Court to a most serious offence. That is an offence of aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence. The serious indictable offence he committed was an assault occasioning actual bodily harm upon a person by the name of Mervyn Hamill. The circumstance of aggravation relied on by the Crown in the charge is that the offender maliciously inflicted actual bodily harm upon Mr Hamill, but the Crown could have relied on other aggravating features of Mr Mason's conduct, a matter I will return to when considering the appropriateness of the standard non-parole period for the present offence.
2 Mr Mason pleaded guilty in the Local Court, as I have mentioned, to this offence and so the sentence I will ultimately impose is reduced by 25 per cent to reflect the utilitarian value of his plea of guilty.
3 Mr Mason and Mr Hamill were neighbours. They got on reasonably well, sharing meals occasionally, but there was a problem with Mr Mason's mental state. He had been receiving treatment from a community based crisis team for some time because of problems he was having, in particular, paranoid schizophrenia. He was on antipsychotic medication for a while, which controlled his aggressive behaviour. However, Mr Mason told the crisis team lies. He told them that he was doing well and not experiencing fits of rage, when these in fact were not true. The crisis team, no doubt due to scarce resources, accepted what Mr Mason said, and so his regular injections stopped. This led to a further deterioration of his behaviour, culminating in the attack on Mr Hamill on 1 January this year.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate