NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Samir Tarjali Diab v The State of NSW and Others [2006] NSWDC 66
HEARING DATE(S): 03/04/2006-12/04/2006 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 04/12/2006
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Neilson DCJ at 1
DECISION: Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant for $5000; I order the first defendant to pay one third of the plaintiff's costs of his action against the first defendant; On the plaintiff's claim against the first defendant for damages for assault, there will be verdict and judgment for the first defendant; On the plaintiff's claim against the first defendant for intimidation by members of the Police Force against the plaintiff, there will be verdict and judgment for the first defendant; Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the third and fourth defendants for $50; I order the plaintiff to pay the costs of the third and fourth defendants
CATCHWORDS: Residential Tenancies Act 1987 - Whether plaintiff a subtenant of a tenant or a lodger - When term of subtenancy expired - Trespass to land of subtenant by police - Whether plaintiff entitled to damages - Whether plaintiff entitled to compensatory damages for psychiatric injury - Whether plaintiff of "normal fortitude"
LEGISLATION CITED: Residential Tenancies Act 1987
Commissioner of Fair Trading v Voulon [2005] WASC 229 Torrisi v Oliver [1951] VR 380 CASES CITED: Chic Fashions (West Wales) Ltd v Jones [1968] 1 All ER 229 TCN Channel 9 v Anning (2002) 54 NSWLR 333 Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635
Samir Tarjali Diab (Plaintiff) The State of NSW (1st Defendant) PARTIES: Anastasia Papageorgious (2nd Defendant) Danielle Kelleher (3rd Defendant) Jason Kelleher (4th Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate