NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Mitchell v Clayton Utz (No 4) [2010] NSWADT 168
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
APPLICANT Michael Mitchell
RESPONDENT Clayton Utz PARTIES: Garth Williams
Jamie Taylor
Narelle Rutz
FILE NUMBER: 091046
HEARING DATES: On the papers
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 25 June 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 6 July 2010
BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President)
CATCHWORDS: EQUAL OPPORTUNITY – application for summonses to issue
LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd (Not 2) 1989 88 ALR 90 at 103 AF v HealthQuest [2009] NSWADT AP 42 CASES CITED: Moylan v Nutrasweet [2000] NSWCA 337 Wiki v Atlantis Relocations (NSW) Pty Limited [2004] NSWCA 174 Sourlos v Luv A Coffee Lismore Pty Limited [2007] NSWCA 203
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT M Byrnes, special counsel
ORDERS: 1. Approval is granted for the following summonses to be issued by the Tribunal:a) summons to give evidence to Dr E Dent;b) Summons to produce the following documents to Clayton Utz:(i) e-mails referred to in the respondent's letter to the Anti-Discrimination Board dated 23 December 2008 in which it was claimed that Jamie Taylor remembers possibly sending e-mails to other colleagues about the applicant's practice of changing in his office (ii) e-mail sent by Jamie Taylor and/or Garth Williams to the applicant referring to the applicants over coat or trenchcoat, c) summons to produce the following documents to St Vincent's Hospital:All medical records and file notes relating to the treatment of Michael Mitchell by Dr Clayton Smith, Dr Chester Omana and Dr Elizabeth Dent including a letter written by Dr Chester Omana dated 8/8/7, a note made by Dr Dent on or about 18, 19 or 20 July 2007, any record of the date and time of Mr Mitchell's appointment with Dr Dent on 18, 19 or 20 July 2006.2. Permission is granted for Dr Dent and Dr Reznek (if required) to give evidence by telephone.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate