NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Scott v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWADT 14
DIVISION: Revenue Division
APPLICANTS Vanessa Pauline Scott and Darren Robert Scott PARTIES: RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
FILE NUMBER: 086084
HEARING DATES: 21 July 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 11 September 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 15 January 2010
BEFORE: Hole M - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Principal place of residence - exemptions - Clause 8 Schedule 1A LTMA
LEGISLATION CITED : Land Tax Management Act 1956
Yen-Cheng Chuang & Anor v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADTAP 160 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Ferrington (GD) [2004] NSWADTAP 41 CASES CITED: Holcombe v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009[ NSWADT 82 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Aldridge & Anor (RD) [2003] NSWADTAP 50 Flaracos v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2003] NSWSC 68 Beashel v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWADT 103
APPLICANT In person –Darren Robert Scott REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT S Kaur-Bains, barrister
ORDERS: 1.The decision of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue dated 21 January 2008 is confirmed.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 The applicants have brought this application in respect of a decision made by the respondent dated 21 January 2008 being assessments for land tax for the years 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and forwarded to the applicants on that date. These assessments related to a property in Batemans Bay ("the subject property"). The applicants sought a review of the decision by letter dated 25 January 2008. On 7 July 2008 the respondent notified the applicants that their objections had been disallowed. Following upon this notification the applicants have made this application to the Tribunal. The application was amended on 25 July 2009.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate