NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Marshall v Dental Decor Pty Ltd t/as Westmead Gentle Dental [2010] NSWADT 173 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the decision for a list of the amendments.
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
APPLICANT Penny Marshall PARTIES: RESPONDENT Dental Decor Pty Ltd t/as Westmead Gentle Dental
FILE NUMBER: 091144
HEARING DATES: 29 June 2010
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 29 June 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 9 July 2010
BEFORE: Perrignon R - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Discrimination on the grounds of sex and age, application by Applicant's husband to appear as agent
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Rules
Curtin v Vice-Chancellor, University of NSW [2005] NSWADT 186 CASES CITED: LN v Sydney South West Area Health Service (GD) [2010] NSWADTAP 16 Dept Justice and Attorney-General v AY (GD) [2010] NSWADTAP 17
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT K Nomchong, barrister
ORDERS: The application by George Marshall for leave to represent the Applicant is declined.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 On 18 June 2009, the applicant, Mrs Marshall, complained to the Anti-Discrimination Board that her employer, the Respondent, had discriminated against her on the grounds of sex and age. The complaint has been referred to the Tribunal pursuant to section 93C of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. The proceedings have been listed for hearing before the Tribunal on 22 and 23 July 2010.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate