NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v De Martin [2009] NSWDC 113
HEARING DATE(S): 13- 14 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 14 May 2009
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Murrell SC DCJ
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Judge alone trial - particular offences - offences against the person - sexual offences - aggravated indecent assualt - tendency evidence - reliability of admission made on paedophile chat log
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 s 61M Evidence Act 1995 s 165(1)(a)
CASES CITED: McKay v R (1935) 54 CLR 1 R v Hatfield [1999] NSWCCA 340
PARTIES: Regina Matthew John DEMARTIN
FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/00019457
COUNSEL: Mr M Pincott of Counsel for the Crown Mr G Heathcote of Counsel for the Accused
SOLICITORS: NSW Director of Public Prosecutions Cater and Blumer Solicitors
1 The accused pleaded guilty to the offence that, between 1 November 2006 and 19 November 2007 at Griffith, he committed an act of indecency towards the complainant.
2 On 13 May 2009, the accused pleaded not guilty to the offence that, between 1 November 2006 and 19 November 2007, he assaulted the complainant and at the time of the assault committed an act of indecency on the complainant by rubbing his penis against the complainant, the complainant being under 16 years of age.
3 On 11 May 2009, the accused elected to be tried by a judge alone and the DPP consented. I was satisfied that, before making the election, the accused had sought and received advice from a barrister.
4 The Crown tendered the record of a chat log on a computer belonging to the accused, and a record of interview between the police and the complainant. The Crown led short oral evidence from the complainant's mother and the officer in charge of the investigation. The accused called no evidence.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate