NSW Caselaw
The Legal Services Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : Carver v The Legal Profession Disciplinary Tribunal and Anor Judgment [1991] NSWLST 5 PARTIES : Carver v The Legal Profession Disciplinary Tribunal and Anor Judgment FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40562/90 of 1990 CORAM: J A Clarke - J A Maegher - A J A Hope CATCHWORDS: Professional Misconduct - misappropriate trust moneys/moneys :- LEGISLATION CITED: Legal Profession Act 1987 Rondel v Worsley, (1969); CASES CITED: Cassidy & Anor v Glover & Anor (29 October 1987, unreported); Myers v Elman, 1940 AC 282 DATES OF HEARING: 17/09/91 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/17/1991 LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
JUDGMENT:
The Supreme Court of New South Wales Court of Appeal Carver v The Legal Profession Disciplinary Tribunal and Anor Judgment
Appeal from arbitration CA 40562/90 Judgment of Clarke JA, Meagher JA, Hope AJA 17 September 1991 Counsel: Appellant: R.A. Skiller Respondent: D. McGovern and P. Sutherland Solicitors: Appellant: Peter Carver, Star Carver & Co Respondent: Frederick Smith Appeal dismissed
Clarke JA
On 3 February 1989 the Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (which I shall describe as the respondent) lodged a complaint with the Disciplinary Tribunal constituted under the Legal Profession Act 1987 complaining that the conduct of Peter George Star Carver (the appellant), a legal practitioner, amounted to professional misconduct. The asserted ground for the complaint was in the following terms: "The continuing failure to abide by an award made by the Joint Tribunal on Fees since on or about 18 June 1987 when the Society forwarded a letter to the solicitor informing him of a council resolution on 4 June 1987 that he be censured."
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate