NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Matthew Darrell Bouveng v Lucas Bolton [2009] NSWDC 19
HEARING DATE(S): 18/02/2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 February 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
The medical dispute between the parties will be referred to the proper officer of the Authority for the purpose of referral for assessment by an orthopaedic specialist. DECISION: The matter is stood in the list for the parties to agree on an appropriate timetable for the preparation of the materials to be forwarded to the proper officer of the Authority for the purpose of the referral. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the application. The affidavit evidence is returned to the parties.
CATCHWORDS: MVA - Further Referral for Medical Assessment - Powers the court to grant relief in the nature of further assessment
LEGISLATION CITED: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999
PARTIES: Matthew Darrell Bouveng (Plaintiff) Lucas Bolton (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 58/07
COUNSEL: Mr Hart (Plaintiff) Mr Cummings (Defendant)
JUDGMENT
1 The plaintiff, Matthew Bouveng, applied to the court for an order for further referral of a medical dispute for assessment. The application was made pursuant to s 62(1)(b) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999.
2 The defendant opposed the application and argued that the proper and appropriate course for the plaintiff to adopt was to exercise his right under s 62(1)(a) to refer the matter for further medical assessment through the proper officer of the Authority.
3 The first question to be addressed was whether the court had the power to grant the relief sought in the application. The next question was whether the court should grant the relief sought, if it is within its power and after having regard to the material placed before it.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate