NSW Caselaw
Equal Opportunity Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION: Lancaster -V- Vice Chancellor, Macquarie University [1996] NSWEOT
COMPLAINANT: Ms Judith Lancaster
RESPONDENT: Vice Chancellor, Macquarie University
NUMBER: 134 of 1995
Mr. Peter King ( Judicial Member ) TRIBUNAL: Ms. Merilyn Alt Ms. Laura Mooney
GROUNDS OF COMPLAINT: Sex Discrimination
DATES OF HEARING: 09/18/1996 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/18/1996
Complainant: Ms. M Bateman (Counsel)
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Minter Ellison (Solicitors) Ms. J Oakley (Counsel)
JUDGMENT IN FAVOUR OF:
In this matter the Respondent has brought an application pursuant to s.111 of the Anti-Discrimination Act (1977) seeking an order dismissing the complaint. The complaint, which is set out in detail in a commendably and clearly pleaded document entitled Amended Points of Claim together with a Schedule of Further Amendments, relies upon the ground of sexual discrimination pursuant to s.24 of the Anti-Discrimination Act (1977) as it then applied as the ground of unlawful conduct.
It is firstly put by the Respondent that certain matters in paragraph 8 of the Points of Claim as Amended, have been raised which were not the subject of the reference by the Anti-Discrimination Board so that the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction in respect of them, and that having regard to the fact that the incidents referred to relate to matters occurring as long ago as 1983 during legal studies at Macquarie University undertaken by the Complainant, that it would be inappropriate to deal with the matters in these proceedings now, for example, by adjournment and reference back. The Complainant stated that these allegations were relied upon in support of her claim of indirect discrimination and not as a separate matter.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate