NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Jones v Heaphy [2009] NSWDC 3
HEARING DATE(S): 18-20,23-25 September 2008, 1-4 December 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 13 February 2009
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
1 Verdict for the plaintiff. DECISION: 2 The proceedings are adjourned to a date to be fixed to deal with issues of costs and interest on past economic loss and for the making of final orders. 3 Reasons published.
CATCHWORDS: MVA - contributory negligence - alcohol, marihuana - extent to which plaintiff was aware or ought to have been aware of defendant's impaired capacity to drive - alleged overstatement of disability.
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act 2002 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999
Joslyn v Berryman (2003) 214 CLR 552 CASES CITED: Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Mackenzie v The Nominal Defendant [2005] NSWCA 180 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd (1985) 59 ALRJ 492
PARTIES: Melissa Joy Jones - Plaintiff Jarrod James Heaphy - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S): Albury 69/06
COUNSEL: P Webb QC, J G Stewart - Plaintiff P D Ryan - Defendant
SOLICITORS: Gibney & Gunston - Plaintiff Moray & Agnew - Defendant
JUDGMENT
1 At about 2 am on 20 February 2003 Jarrod James Heaphy drove a car at excessive speed through the streets of Culcairn, lost control of it and caused it to collide with a power pole in Edward Street. Melissa Joy Jones was seriously injured. She was a front seat passenger in the car driven by defendant.
2 The accident occurred after the plaintiff, the defendant and a number of other young persons spent the evening and early hours of 19 and 20 February 2003 at an hotel, a private home and the caravan park in Culcairn. They all consumed alcohol and some of them smoked marihuana.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate