NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Hertzberg v McLeod [2007] NSWDC 9
HEARING DATE(S): 9 February 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 14 February 2007
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Gibson DCJ
DECISION: 1. Imputation 3(a) struck out; 2. Imputation 3(d) struck out; 3. Grant leave to the plaintiff to plead the following imputation in lieu of 3(d): "3(d) – the plaintiff so conducted himself that his conduct requires investigation by the South Western Area Health Service; 4. Grant leave to re-plead imputations 3(e) as follows: "the plaintiff neglected his patients because he left them 3, 4 or 5 times a year in order to attend junket conferences."; 5. Imputation 3(m) struck out; 6. Paragraph 4 of Statement of claim struck out; 7. Imputation 6(a) struck out; 8. Imputation 6(d) struck out; 9. Grant leave to plead 6(d) as follows: "the plaintiff so conducted himself that his conduct requires investigation by the Minister of Health."; 10. Grant leave to amend imputation 6(e) as follows: "The plaintiff neglected his patients 3, 4, 5 times a year to attend junket conferences."; 11. Imputation 6(m) struck out; 12. Paragraph 7 of Statement of Claim struck out; 13. Each party pay their own costs.
CATCHWORDS: defamation - section 7A jury trial - late amendment of pleadings - use of actual words from the publication in imputations
LEGISLATION CITED: Defamation Act 1974 (NSW)
Allsop v Church of England Newspapers [1972] 2 QB 161 Bass v TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 343 Drummoyne Municipal Council v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1990) 21 NSWLR 135 Falkner v Cooper (1666) Carter 55 Harvey v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd v Gacic (2006) NSWCA 175 Lewis v Daily Telegraph Limited [1964] AC 234 CASES CITED: Liberate v Daily Mirror Newspapers Limited, The Times, June 18, 1959 Mahommed v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 213 Monte v Mirror Newspapers [1979] 2 NSWLR 663 Sergi v Australian Broadcasting Commission [1983] 2 NSWLR 669 Singleton v Ffrench (1985-6) 5 NSWLR 425 Thaarup v Hulton Press (1943) 169 LT 309 Whelan v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1988) 12 NSWLR 148
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate