NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Faiva PECKHAM [2010] NSWDC 163
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 March 2010
JURISDICTION: District Court of New South Wales
JUDGMENT OF: Cogswell SC DCJ
DECISION: For the robbery offence, non-parole period of 18 months, balance of term of 12 months. For the demand money offence, non-parole period of 15 months, balance of term of 5 months. Referred to Drug Court to determine whether Mr Peckham should be the subject of a Compulsory Drug Treatment Order.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - robbery - demanding money with menaces - s 166 offence taken into account - offence committed on public transport - threat of use of a knife - prior criminal record - offence committed while on parole - drug and alcohol problems - spontaneous nature of crimes - plea of guilty at earliest opportunity - referral to Drug Court to determine suitability for a Compulsory Drug Treatment Order
Crimes Act 1900 s 94, s 99(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 50 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s 166 Drug Court Act 1998 s 50
CASES CITED: R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58
PARTIES: Regina Faiva Peckham
FILE NUMBER(S): 2009/41858
SOLICITORS: Ms Duncalfe for the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions NSW Mr Bogan for Mr Peckham
-
JUDGMENT
SENTENCE
1. I am sentencing Faiva Peckham for two crimes. One is the crime of robbery and the other is the crime of demanding money with menaces. The first is made into a crime by s 94 of the Crimes Act 1900 and carries a maximum of fourteen years imprisonment. The second is contained in s 99(1) of the same Act and it carries a maximum of ten years imprisonment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate