NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Military Road Island Pty Ltd v Priority Plus Capital Pty Ltd; Priority Plus Capital Pty Ltd v Military Road Island Pty Ltd [2008] NSWDC 268
HEARING DATE(S): 26 November 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 December 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Goldring DCJ
DECISION: (1) Verdict for the plaintiff against the defendants for $200,000 plus interest to the date of judgment. (2) Dismiss cross claim.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACTS - Total failure of consideration - interpretation
CASES CITED: Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 179 CLR 344 David Securities Pty Limited v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353
Military Road Island Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) PARTIES: Priority Plus Capital Pty Ltd (First Defendant/Cross Claimant) Anthony Brian Fleiter (Second Defendant) Phillip Thomas Austin Whittaker (Third Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 1519 of 2008
COUNSEL: N Ford, solicitor (Plaintiff) S Bliim (First, Second and Third Defendant)
SOLICITORS: Brischetto & Ford (Plaintiff) Macquarie Legal Practice (First, Second and Third Defendant)
JUDGMENT
Issues
1 The issues in this case are, first, whether the plaintiff ("MRI") is entitled to recover $200,000, being what is called in the relevant contract a "success fee", and, secondly, whether the first defendant and cross-claimant ("Priority Plus" or "PP") is entitled to a refund of some $267,000 or part thereof, being what is called a "know-how" fee. MRI contends that PP has resold the subject matter of the agreement to a third party, which awakens clause 4.9 of the agreement. PP contends that MRI failed to supply what it expected by way of "know-how".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate