NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Appeal of Brent Thomas James Slater [2008] NSWDC 170
HEARING DATE(S): 22 April, 27 May 2008 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 27 May 2008
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Goldring DCJ
DECISION: Application by Crown to disqualify judge from hearing this appeal granted.
CATCHWORDS: JUDGES AND COURTS - Apprehended bias - Appeals to District Court from Local Court - appeals - jurisdiction - procedure
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Appeal and Review Act) 2001
R v Sin NSWCCA 18 April 2008 CASES CITED: Ebner v Official Trustee (2000) 205 CLR 337 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Kriss (2007) NSWCA 79
PARTIES: Brent Thomas James Slater (Appellant) Crown (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): Wollongong 2008/0452
COUNSEL: N Keay (Appellant) D Degnan (Crown)
SOLICITORS: Legal Aid Commission NSW DPP
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: This is an application by the Crown for me to disqualify myself from hearing this appeal.
2 This matter first came before me on 22 April. I was under the impression, possibly mistaken, that the matter was an appeal against conviction listed for hearing on that day. In fact, that turned out not to be the case.
3 The Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act, s 18, provides in subsection (1) that an appeal against conviction is to be by way of rehearing, on the basis of certified transcripts of the evidence given in the original Local Court proceedings, except as provided by s 19. It is my practice, especially when the list is heavy, to read in advance the transcripts of evidence on the court file, in order to save time. So far as I am concerned, that is the evidence, on the basis of which the appeal is to proceed, although I know it is the practice of some Crown Prosecutors to tender the transcript.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate