NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Jones [2009] NSWDC 8
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 January 2009
JURISDICTION: Crime
JUDGMENT OF: Murrell SC DCJ
CATCHWORDS: Sentence - Possess Child Pornography
Crimes Act 1900 s 91H(3) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Case Conferencing Trial Act 2008 s 17 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 3A s 21A
Mouscas v R [2008] NSWCCA 181 CASES CITED: R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370 R v Saddler [2008] NSWDC 48 R v Stroempl (1995) 105 C.C.C.
PARTIES: Regina Richard JONES
FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/00014928
SOLICITORS: Ms K Thompson (Crown) Mr P Elks (For the Defendant)
JUDGMENT
1. The offender pleaded guilty before the Local Court at the Downing Centre to two offences of possessing child pornography contrary to s 91H (3) Crimes Act 1900. The maximum available penalty for each offence is five years imprisonment. No standard non-parole period applies.
2. Pursuant to s 17 of the Criminal Case Conferencing Trial Act 2008, if an offender pleads guilty to an offence prior to committal for sentence, a mandatory discount of 25% is to be applied to any "sentence of imprisonment for a term" [s 17(1)(a)] and to any "good behaviour bond for a term" [s 17(1)(d)].
3. To date, the offender has spent no time in custody.
4. The offender is a 64-year-old married man with two adult children. He is a former Customs officer. In the last few years of his employment as a Customs officer, it was part of the offender's duties to examine contraband items imported into Australia. Not infrequently, those items included child pornography. The offender received no counseling in relation to the psychological impact of that work.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate