NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 6 DCLR (NSW) 45
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Macey v Macquarie Generation & HIS Engineering Pty Ltd [2007] NSWDC 242
HEARING DATE(S): 8-12 , 15-16.10.07
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 November 2007
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
DECISION: 1. Verdict for the Macquarie Generation on Mr Macey's claim; 2. Verdict for HIS Engineering Pty Ltd on Macquarie Generation's cross claim; 3. Proceedings adjourned to a date to be fixed to hear argument concerning the costs of the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS: Workplace injury - S151Z - Proof of employment & payment of compensation - Breach of statutory duty: whether to be determined under Civil Liability Act - Standard of care to be applied
Civil Liability Act 2002 LEGISLATION CITED: Occupational Health & Safety Act 2000 Workers Compensation Act 1987
CASES CITED: Fox v Wood (1981) 148 CLR 438
Jason MACEY PARTIES: MACQUARIE GENERATION HIS ENGINEERING PTY LTD
FILE NUMBER(S): Newcastle 56 of 2006
Plaintiff - C A W Hart COUNSEL: Defendant/cross claimant - P J Menary Cross defendant - D Shoebridge
Plaintiff - Bale Boshev Lawyers SOLICITORS: Defendant - Sparke Helmore Cross defendant - Fisher Cartwright Berriman
JUDGMENT
1 Jason Andrew Macey claims that he suffered an injury to his right shoulder in the course of his employment as a boilermaker at Bayswater Power Station. 2 He holds Macquarie Generation, the owner and occupier of the power station, responsible for his injury, claiming breach of statutory duty and negligence. 3 Macquarie Generation cross claims against HIS Engineering Services Pty Limited that it employed Mr Macey at the time of his injury, that it owed him a non delegable duty of care as well as obligations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000, and that it was in breach of its contractual obligations to Macquarie Generation. 4 The issues were: (a) precisely how Mr Macey's injury occurred; (b) whether the means of access provided to the area of the Power Station in which Mr Macey was working were such that they breached the requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000; (c) whether Mr Macey's injury was the result of negligence on the part of Macquarie Generation; (d) the extent of any liability of HIS for the injury suffered by Mr Macey; (e) whether there was contributory negligence on the part of Mr Macey; (f) the extent to which Mr Macey's shoulder was injured in the course of any workplace accident; (g) the compensation to be awarded to Mr Macey; (h) the application of s 151Z of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 to any damages recovered by Mr Macey; (i) it being admitted that HIS breached its contractual obligations to Macquarie Generation, the damages arising from the breach.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate