NSW Caselaw
CITATION: UT v NSW Department of Corrective Services [2010] NSWADT 221
DIVISION: General Division
APPLICANT UT PARTIES: RESPONDENT Department of Corrective Services
FILE NUMBER: 083215
HEARING DATES: 18 September 2009 and 27 April 2010
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 1 June 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 9 September 2010
BEFORE: Wilson R - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Evidence - whether evidence sufficient to establish breach of privacy legislation
LEGISLATION CITED : Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT Ms Brus, barrister
ORDERS: 1. The applicant is granted leave to re-open his case and adduce further evidence and submissions 2. In relation to the substantive proceedings the decision under review is affirmed.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 The applicant has brought these proceedings in the Tribunal pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 following an unsuccessful application for internal review.
2 Following an initial hearing on 18.09.09 the applicant sought leave to re-open his case in order to adduce additional evidence and to make further arguments in support of his case. This application had in fact been foreshadowed by the applicant at an earlier stage. The parties addressed this application at hearing on 27.04.10 and, at the same time, addressed the substantive issues arising should such leave be given. Further time was then allowed for the parties to file additional submissions should they be so advised. Consequently, both the interlocutory application to re-open and the substantive review were reserved as at 01.06.10.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate