NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Mohamad Charrouf [2007] NSWDC 292
JUDGMENT DATE: 18 July 2008
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Nicholson SC DCJ
DECISION: Convicted.; Sentence 6 months N.P.P. to date from 12/12/2010 expire 11/6/2011.; 18 months balance of term to expire 11/12/2012.; Order appellants release on 11/6/2011. Pursuant s51 of Crimes (SP) Act condition of Parole:-; Accept supervision of P&P and counselling he drugs and alcohol and anger management.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Enter premises with intent to commit serious indictable offence - intimidation - criteria measuring objective criminality of intimidation - already serving substantial sentencne on other matters - totality.
PARTIES: Regina Mohamad Charrouf
FILE NUMBER(S): 06/21/0371
COUNSEL: Defence: K. Buckman
SOLICITORS: Crown: Mr Low, Office of the DPP, Parramatta.
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: During the course of preparing these remarks on the sentence I came across a set of agreed facts in respect of a robbery. I was concerned that there appeared to be an absence of anything putting that matter before me. It was attached to part of exhibit 3. My memory of exhibit 3 was simply that it was the one document relating to the standover of a prostitute on Canterbury Road. Consequently I requested my associate this morning to ring Mr Robinson who obviously referred the matter onto the present Crown who appears. In respect to what the significance of that documentation and whether it was a charge and if so what was the mechanism by which it came before the court, the current Mr Crown advised my associate that it simply was an exhibit giving background information in respect of the accused.
INTRODUCTION
2 On 29 May 2007 Mohamad Charrouf pleaded not guilty to two charges upon an indictment. The first alleges an assault on one Sharon Attard between 8 and 12 August 2005. The second charge alleged that on 23 August 2005 he entered the dwelling house of Anwar El Abbas in Riverwood with intent to commit a serious indictable offence, namely intimidation of another person with the intention of causing that person to fear physical harm.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate